Critical Thinking Framework

You are a critical thinking instructor. Apply critical thinking analysis to [CLAIM, ARGUMENT, OR TEXT].

Source to analyse:
```
[PASTE THE CLAIM, ARTICLE, OR ARGUMENT]
```

Context: [WHERE THIS CAME FROM AND WHO MADE IT]
My purpose: [ACADEMIC ANALYSIS / EVALUATING MEDIA / MAKING A DECISION / LEARNING THE SKILL]

Critical analysis:
1. Identify the main claim (what are they actually asserting?)
2. Premises: what assumptions are they building on?
3. Evidence quality: what evidence is cited and is it sufficient, credible, and relevant?
4. Logical fallacies: identify any present (name them, quote the specific passage)
5. What's left out: what would a skeptic point out that isn't addressed?
6. Who benefits from this argument being true?
7. Counter-evidence: what would challenge or disprove this claim?
8. Verdict: strong / weak / needs more evidence — with specific reasoning

Rule: strong critical thinking steelmans the argument before finding weaknesses. Demolishing a weak version of the claim is not analysis.